Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale (ICDS). (Hamamci Buyukozturk, 2004). The second subscale, Unrealistic Relationship Expectation, consisting eight items implies that individuals had high expectations in their relationships concerning both their own behaviors and the behaviors of others. The third subscale, Interpersonal Misperception, comprised three items. This subscale is based on the belief that individuals can predict the thoughts and emotions of the others without overt communication. 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (I strongly disagree) to 5 (I strongly agree) was used. Scores were ranged from 0 to 151. Higher score indicated greater adherence to dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient was .67 for total scale 73, for the first subscale, .66 for the second subscale and .43 for the third subscale. The correlation coefficients measured for randomly split sample were ranged from .56 to .73 for three subscales. Test-retest coefficient in 15 days was .74. Convergent validity was evident in the positive correlations among the ICDS subscales and the Turkish versions of Automatic Thoughts Scale (r = .54, p<.001 ) and Irrational Belief Scale (r = .54, p<.001). Construct validity was evident in the positive correlation with the Conflict Tendency Scale (r = -.53 p<.001). The bivariate correlations between the different factors of the ICDS ranged between .07 and. 15.
Dispute Resolution Scale (CRS) (Akbalik, 2001).This level was designed to gauge the behaviors incompatible quality procedure for late adolescents. Discover 55 circumstances according to the five subscales also knowledge other individuals, hearing experience, focusing on others’ needs, societal adaption and you will rage government. The shape was utilized a good 5-point Likert-style of measure, anywhere between step 1 = completely not true out of us to 4 = mostly true off me. Throughout the measure, 34 circumstances have been scored absolutely and you will 21 factors have been scored inversely https://datingranking.net/nl/colombiancupid-overzicht/. CRS scores was indeed varied of 55 to 220 with high ratings indicating expert from conflict resolution behaviors. Leader coefficient out-of internal surface of your size are .91 .This beliefs have been .86 towards the very first subscale, .82 towards the next subscale, .75 to your third subscale, .78 toward last subscale and you will .80 brand new fifth subscale.
The original subscale, Interpersonal Rejection with eight factors incorporated circumstances connected with bad attribution of your own individuals on people’ routines and you may properties and values relevant in order to getting most close to anybody else in their relationship grounds bad consequences
Moms and dads Adolescent Dating Measure (Kaner, 2000). Which measure was applied to assess individually mother or father-adolescent interactions out of adolescents’ effect. On the scale, there had been seven subscales (close correspondence, connected with personal interest along with her, sensitivity, love and you can faith, overseeing, organization standard, rewarding expectations) both for mommy means (MRS) and you may dad function (FRS), however in father setting there can be an additional subscale together with family regulations. Mother setting was made up from 30 situations beneath the eight subscales. Father setting consists of 37 items underneath the eigth subscales. The dimensions was applied 5-point-size (5 = never, step one = always). Ranges acquiring out of mom’s setting was from a single in order to 150. Dad function try ranged from 1 so you’re able to 185. Large score indicate adolescents’ bad attitudes of their relations which have parents. Reliability of your kinds of mother and father was basically complete separately. Cronbach leader coefficient away from internal structure is .ninety five mom means and. 93 to possess father means. Correlation coefficients determined towards very first and you can second halves of the attempt had been .83 to possess mother means. Split-half coefficient was discover while the .82 to possess dad form.
The size consisted of around three subscales which have 19 issues; Interpersonal Rejection, Unlikely Relationships Expectation and Social Misperception
Forms was indeed administered to happy pupils in their categories ranging from and you can these were finished in one to course. It got nearly one hour to apply devices. Just before management, the sort of analysis is explained, questionnaires are discussed so you’re able to people and then concur of contribution is acquired lastly these people were informed exactly how they had so you’re able to respond to things toward questionnaires. Information got one another vocally and you may composed. Users were in addition to told one a listing of the brand new results you are going to be given to players who desire understand the outcomes.